Be careful
of the tricky wording of Amendment #1 on the upcoming election. It is
being PR’d by the Louisiana Nursing Home Association as a benefit to the
elderly in this state. This may not be the case.
When Mike
Foster was governor of our state he used matching federal monies to set up the
Medicaid Trust Fund for the Elderly. The fund contained more than $830
million. The original intent of the trust fund was to leave the
principle intact and use the interest and investment earnings to fund community
and home support services for the elderly so that they could remain living
independently in their homes for a longer time. It basically postponed
the time when it finally became necessary to enter a nursing home facility.
When Jindal
took over, he, along with legislators’ approval, raided the principal amount of
the elderly trust fund to prevent Medicaid funding cuts from being implemented
for PRIVATE nursing homes throughout the state. While other medical services
throughout the state received drastic funding cuts, the PRIVATE nursing homes
were shielded from such cuts with the fund’s money.
It is
estimated that the ENTIRE fund will be wiped out by the end of Jindal’s term.
With an eye
on the future, the Louisiana Nursing Home Association has realized their
protection from state budget cuts is about to end. Consequently, they got
the legislators to propose a constitutional amendment that will protect nursing
homes from any future state budget cuts, Amendment #1 on the ballot.
Amendment
passage will make it very difficult for the state to reduce funding rates for
nursing homes.
If yet
another entity is protected by constitutional amendment from state budget cuts,
deeper cuts will be made to education, medical services, behavioral help
services, and home help services because they have no such constitutional
funding protection.
Unlike what
the Louisiana Nursing Home Association would like you to believe, a ‘NO’ vote
will be the real benefit for senior citizens in our state. It will
allow legislators more opportunities to spread any future budgetary cuts
equally among ALL aspects of care for the elderly, and permit more monies to be
utilized to continue the services which allow seniors to remain living
independently in their homes for a longer time.
It is
imperative that legislators be given this budgetary flexibility in light of the
fact that Jindal has completely wiped out the Medicaid Trust Fund for the
Elderly, funds that will NEVER be restored.
Vote ‘NO’
for Amendment #1.
No comments:
Post a Comment